Writing up and disseminating your findings
Guidance on writing up and disseminating your findings.
Writing up your findings
Once your data analysis is complete, write up and disseminate your findings.
Now that you’ve collected and collated and analysed and interpreted your data, this is your opportunity to think about and set your findings in context with previous research.
You’ve already planned how you intend to disseminate your findings.
It’s important to be familiar with the breadth and depth expected of your reporting. These specify the minimum set of items necessary for you to write a clear and complete account of your research project.
The Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network provides a comprehensive set of reporting guidelines you can follow for most study designs
As part of your dissemination plan you’ll be expected to report whether you received ethical approval. This can be as simple as a single sentence stating: “This study received ethical approval from XXX on XXX: Project Number: XXX.”
Research report
A report may be written for a variety of reasons and audiences. This will influence the way it needs to be presented.
If you received funding for your research you’re likely to need to write a formal report. Your funder will have guidance on how to present your report.
A typical report will include the below.
Book
If you want to share your research as a book you’ll need to negotiate a contract with a publisher. As a minimum, the publisher will expect you to provide the below.
Each publisher will have their own guidelines so check publisher web sites before you get started. See the Academic Publishers’ Directory for publishers' details.
Research article
If you want to reach a wider readership for your research then you’ll probably want to publish a journal article.
While scientific journals typically structure their content using Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRAD), a typical Knowledge and Library Services (KLS) research project will usually have a more expansive structure.
Each journal will have their own author guidelines so check their preferred article length and submission process before you get started.
You can usually find a journal’s author guidelines on their web pages or on the inside cover of the journal. The following journals are key sources for KLS research.
- Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP).
- Health Information and Libraries Journal (HILJ).
- Journal of Hospital Librarianship.
- Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA).
- Library and Information Research (LIR).
- Library and Information Science Research.
- LIS Publications Wiki: Research. Write. Publish.
Blogs
Blogs are a great way of sharing a short account of your research findings in a more informal, conversational style than a research report or journal article.
Blogs are regularly updated web sites. They can be a great way to link into your local KLS networks. A good example of a KLS blog is the Library Knowledge Services (North) blog.
Before you submit your writing
When you’re ready to share your writing, you can increase the visibility of your research, before it is peer-reviewed, by depositing a pre-print in a local repository or dedicated pre-print service.
You may be asked for your ORCID iD a free, unique and universal identifier that distinguishes you from other researchers. You own and control your ORCID iD and, by using an ORCID iD, you ensure that you get recognition for all your affiliations and publications.
Working with a publisher
If your chosen journal is peer reviewed, the editor will invite 2 or more people to provide an assessment of your work. The intention is to help you give the best possible account of your work. Your work may go back and forth between you and the publisher before it is accepted for publication.
You can submit the accepted version of your writing to a local repository, though access may need to be temporarily restricted.
Sherpa Romeo summarises publisher copyright and open access archiving policies for publishers around the world.
The publisher will copy-edit your work, removing typographical errors and reference inaccuracies. You may also be asked to clarify points of ambiguity. Your work will then be formatted in the journal’s house style. You’ll be given an opportunity to confirm the accuracy of the formatted file before it’s published.
When you work is accepted for publication you’ll be asked to sign a copyright licence. Depending on who you’ve chosen to publish with, this may be an open access creative commons licence where you retain copyright, or a transfer agreement that outlines the publishers’ terms for access and reuse.
Presenting at a conference, seminar or within your Trust
Presenting your research face-to-face can be a great way to disseminate your findings or get feedback on your work and to garner support when seeking to put your findings into practice.
Below are some tips when preparing your presentation.
- Simplify your research. Presentations are typically 20 minutes long including questions. The amount of information you will be able to share is therefore limited. If you’re preparing a PowerPoint presentation, aim for each slide to be on screen for about 2 minutes. Those listening can digest the information before you move on.
- Anticipate your audience. At a conference your audience is more likely to be interested in your findings and how they might use them to inform their own practice. A brief overview of your methods is all that’s needed.
- Practice. You know your research project better than anyone else, but regularly practising your presentation will help you become more comfortable talking about your work in a formal setting. If you can, practise in front of supportive colleagues who you can rely upon to give you constructive feedback and boost your confidence level.
Key conferences include:
- Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) Conference.
- European Association for Health Information and Libraries (EAHIL) Conference.
- Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) Conference.
- International Congress on Medical Librarianship (ICML) Conference.
- Medical Library Association (MLA) Conference.
Suggested reading
- Grant, M J, Munro, W, McIsaac, J, and Hill, S (2010) Cross-disciplinary writers’ group stimulates fresh approaches to scholarly communication: a reflective case study within a higher education institution in the North West of England New Review of Academic Librarianship, Volume 16 Issue 1), pages 44 to 64 is a case study of a collaborative writers’ group to support novice writers which you may wish to emulate in your own organisation
- Shelling, J (2013) Disseminating your project findings in M J Grant, B Sen, and H Spring (Editors), Research, evaluation and audit: key steps in demonstrating your value (pages 203 to 214) London: Facet Publishing - is a comprehensive introduction to disseminating research, provides a wide variety of dissemination strategies and encourages you to prepare your dissemination plan early in your research planning
Page last reviewed: 23 August 2023
Next review due: 23 August 2024